|
"As a result
of the difficult trading conditions,
the group embraced a "Back to Basics"
strategy and initiated a thorough
review of each segment of our business
and the markets in which they operated."
On behalf of the
Board of Directors , I present an
overview of our business activities
and srategies undertaken for the financal
year ended 31 December 2000.
By the end of 2000,
the level of construction activity
in Singapore had declined for 9 consecutive
quarters . The total value of contracts
excluding reclamation projects, awarded
in 2000 fell by 10.1%. This drop in
construction demand follows the 18%
decline experienced in 1999. Under
these difficult trading conditions
, both volumes and prices for most
construction materials continued to
fall.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
At Group level, turnover of $258.5
million was 14.2% lower than that
of $301.3 million in the previous
year due largely to the generally
low prices for construction materials
and the disposals of the three under-performing
subsidiaries during the year. With
the lower turnover, and $10. 5 million
for depreciation and amortization,
the Group incurred a loss of $10.
6 million before taxation but after
accounting for income derived from
associated companies amounting to
$2. 6 million. This was due in part
to losses incurred by the quarry and
related logistic s operations under
the said three subsidiaries which
have been disposed of and the Hong
Kong precast concrete business. Operating
loss after tax attributable to members
amounted to $10.3 million during the
year under review.
The Group
ended the year with a cash balance
of approximately $27 million as at
31 December 2000.
Notwithstanding
the losses in 2000, the Board is recommending
a first and final dividend of 3% les
s 24. 5% tax. The total net dividend
payable will amount to $883, 350,
which is based on the total issued
capital of 195, 000, 000 s hares of
20 cents each as at 31 Dec ember 2000.
DIVESTMENTS/ACQUISITIONS/RESTRUCTURING
As a result of the difficult trading
conditions, the Group embraced a Back
to Basics strategy and initiated a
thorough review of each segment of
our business and the markets in which
they operated. The aim of the review
was to identify competitive business
with good quality assets as well as
high cost businesses with poor long
term cost competitiveness. The first
component of the Back to Basics approach
was to progressively divest or shut
down non-competitive high cost operations
identified in the review. The second
component was to take advantage of
the current downturn to acquire attractive
assets to improve the quality of our
asset base.
|